[XeTeX] XeTeX/MiKTeX bug: \graphicspath does not work as intended
lomov.vl at gmail.com
Sat Dec 26 04:30:05 CET 2009
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 14:24:17 +0100, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
> Am Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:37:39 +0600 schrieb Igor Kotelnikov:
Igor Kotelnikov => IK
Ulrike Fischer => UF
IK>> I looked through several old posts reporting same issues butb did not
IK>> understand whether they were fixed or not. I am using the most recent MiKTeX
IK>> and I found that
IK>> 1. \graphicspath does not work with xetex as it does with latex and
IK>> 2. empty extension of a graphics file is not allowed in \includegraphics.
IK>> I mean that
IK>> does not work but
IK>> inserts figure.pdf located if graphs subdirectory.
IK>> Both these features (\graphicspath and empty extension ) of the graphics(x)
IK>> packages are documented in a number of latex manuals and I belived that
IK>> xelatex must follow the standards of the latex markup. I wonder if these
IK>> deviations from the latex standard is a feature of XeLaTeX itself or is it a
IK>> MiKTeX bug?
UF> I can't reproduce the problem.
UF> The following works fine for me and use testimg.pdf in the subfolder
UF> I tested with xetex 3.1415926-2.2-0.999.7 from miktex 2.7 and
UF> xetex 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.1 from miktex 2.8.
Confirm, works on TL 2009 (distro package and TL distribution)
May be a bug in MiKTeX?
Drive defensively. Buy a tank.
More information about the XeTeX