[XeTeX] XeTeX/MiKTeX bug: \graphicspath does not work as intended

Igor Kotelnikov igor.kotelnikov at gmail.com
Thu Dec 24 15:37:39 CET 2009


I looked through several old posts reporting same issues butb did not
understand whether they were fixed or not. I am using the most recent MiKTeX
and I found that

1. \graphicspath does not work with xetex as it does with latex and
2. empty extension of a graphics file is not allowed in \includegraphics.

I mean that
does not work but
inserts figure.pdf located if graphs subdirectory.

Both these features (\graphicspath and empty extension ) of the graphics(x)
packages are documented in a number of latex manuals and I belived that
xelatex must follow the standards of the latex markup. I wonder if these
deviations from the latex standard is a feature of XeLaTeX itself or is it a
MiKTeX bug?

Igor A. Kotelnikov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20091224/b8c86443/attachment.html>

More information about the XeTeX mailing list