[XeTeX] c.t.t. post re: \mag

Will Robertson wspr81 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 20 01:05:18 CET 2008


On 20/02/2008, at 9:42 AM, Bruno Voisin wrote:

> Accordingly, for somebody who used (plain) TeX for years before
> getting introduced to pdfTeX, it is expected that \mag and
> \magnification won't affect the media size. Which they do if I'm not
> mistaken. Which prevents typesetting of old documents, and hence
> breaks backwards compatibility.

I'm pretty sure that when the pdf(la)tex format is built, it (now!)  
uses a different definition of \mag that *does* preserve backwards  
compatibility.

Will
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2415 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20080220/3d62d943/attachment.bin 


More information about the XeTeX mailing list