[XeTeX] c.t.t. post re: \mag

[Andreas Matthias]

Jonathan Kew wrote:

> Two bugs, actually; xetex was incorrectly scaling the \pdfpagewidth  
> and height values when generating its xdv output, and xdvipdfmx was  
> handling the \specials inconsistently.
> 
> I have just checked in corrections to both xetex and xdvipdfmx, and I  
> believe this stuff is now working correctly.

Thanks. It's working great now.

However, there's one little nuisance. During testing I wrote
\special{papersize=100mmtrue,200mmtrue}. Note the wrong dimensions;
it should me `100truemm'. Running this through xetex didn't produce
any warnings, although running xdvipdfmx individually did produce a
warning.

It would be very helpful if warning messages of xdvipdfmx wouldn't
get choked by xetex.


Ciao
Andreas