[XeTeX] Installing xetex in Linux
Peter_Dyballa at Web.DE
Thu Dec 11 18:50:57 CET 2008
Am 11.12.2008 um 16:41 schrieb Apostolos Syropoulos:
>>> In most, if not all, Linux distributions sh is a softlink to bash.
>> softlinks can be found in men's trousers, not in UNIX.
> OK I meant soft link, which is a common alternative to
> symbolic link.
How can something wrong be an alternative? First there were hard-
links, which are restricted to their file system. Then symbolic links
were added, which simulate the behaviour of hard-links and break
through the file system barrier. So why don't you use the term new-
link or alternative-link or alt-link? There is nothing soft, they all
exist hard on the hard disk. Nothing is imagined. Or soft.
>> The shell script starts with
>> It's strange to assume that something else might be meant by this
>> clear statement – and a computer would understand!
> I am sorry but I do not agree. A typical google search makes clear
> that Linux-people talk about sh but they actually mean bash or
> dash or whatever.
So they first should learn to use the proper terms (for example in
school), then enter internet. I won't change my verbal behaviour
because some billions start to use in inappropriate places “cool” or
„geil“ or other four letter words.
When Richard Stallman goes to the loo, he core dumps.
More information about the XeTeX