[XeTeX] Could JK provide a little backgound on how OpenType MATH tables are handled?
wspr81 at gmail.com
Wed Aug 13 16:15:15 CEST 2008
On 13/08/2008, at 10:01 PM, Vasile Gaburici wrote:
> Will Robertson has this sentence in the documentation for
> unicode-math: "Turns out that XƎTEX is clever enough to deal with big
> operators for us automatically with \XeTeXmathchardef. Amazing!".
There's a bunch of stuff that I still have to do manually, though,
which is not yet implemented. No time, no time…
Anyway, with regard to your two queries: in both cases I believe your
thinking is correct, although I haven't studied the implementation.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2415 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20080813/768e58f9/attachment.bin
More information about the XeTeX