[XeTeX] xetexref updated

[caapv 208]

--- Jonathan Kew <jonathan_kew at sil.org> wrote:

> That's a fun example -- except that unfortunately
> the Pak Nastaleeq  
> font doesn't render well in XeTeX. (I'm not sure at
> this point  
> whether this is due to limitations of the ICU layout
> code, font  
> weirdness, or both!) With some other fonts, the
> results look a lot  
> better. But in any case, it illustrates the
> potential of the inter- 
> char-toks mechanism.

I don't know, but glyph substitutions and horizontal
positionings look OK.  Vertical positionings surely
are weird.

The file rendered weird in gedit in a different way
with the font.  Here is what I see on the terminal:

Error loading GPOS table 4129

Do you want me to take a look?

> JK

Regards,
SMiyata

--------------------------------------
Start Yahoo! Auction now! Check out the cool campaign
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/auction/