[XeTeX] trouble compiling from svn

Will Robertson wspr81 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 13 14:49:59 CEST 2007


On 13/06/2007, at 1:07 , Jonathan Kew wrote:

>    sh build-xetex 2>&1 | tee build.log
>
> this will capture all the console output into a log file, so it's
> easy to review it and look for problems.

I tried again, and still no luck. Here's the bit that seems to be the  
culprit:

  g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"silgraphite\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"silgraphite 
\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"2.2.0\" "-DPACKAGE_STRING=\"silgraphite 2.2.0 
\"" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"silgraphite-devel at lists.sourceforge.net\" - 
DPACKAGE=\"silgraphite\" -DVERSION=\"2.2.0\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 - 
DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 - 
DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 - 
DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 - 
DWORDS_BIGENDIAN=1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 - 
DSIZEOF_WCHAR_T=4 -I. -I../../../../libs/graphite-engine/src - 
I../../../../libs/graphite-engine/include -I../../../../libs/graphite- 
engine/src/generic -I../../../../libs/graphite-engine/src/font - 
I../../../../libs/graphite-engine/src/segment -g -O2 -DNDEBUG -MT  
GrSlotStream.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/GrSlotStream.Tpo -c ../../../../ 
libs/graphite-engine/src/segment/GrSlotStream.cpp -o GrSlotStream.o
../../../../libs/graphite-engine/src/segment/GrSlotStream.cpp: In  
member function 'int gr::GrSlotStream::GetSlotDirLevel 
(gr::EngineState*, int, int, int, gr::DirCode, gr::DirCode)':
../../../../libs/graphite-engine/src/segment/GrSlotStream.cpp:559:  
internal compiler error: Bus error
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter> for instructions.
make[1]: *** [GrSlotStream.lo] Error 1
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

Would you like the whole log file or more information from me?
It's weird that this doesn't work for me...and I don't know where to  
look to find the problem :(

By the way, why doesn't the compilation bail when this problem first  
occurs? It would strike me as being more convenient :)

Will


More information about the XeTeX mailing list