[XeTeX] XeTeX Digest, Vol 32, Issue 6

[Gour]

On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 09:29 +0100, Ralf Stubner wrote:

> Why? While Latin Modern has many glyphs, there are still large (latin
> based) ranges of Unicode that are not covered. I would simply use a font
> that does include proper glyphs for these Unicode positions. Gentium or
> Charis SIL come to mind, which IMO look nicer than LM anyway.

Well, the choice is not so great as when using TeX-fonts with accents.

> 
> > p.s. Was I supposed to change Subject of the message or this list does
> > not like hijacking?
> 
> IMO it is best to post e new message with a new subject when starting a
> completly unrelated discussion. Replying to an existing message makes it
> harder for the various clients to keep the threads together.

But, this one is (hopefully) related.


Sincerely,
Gour

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20061108/6d437ad0/attachment.bin