[XeTeX] XeTeX Digest, Vol 32, Issue 6
list at atmarama.org
Wed Nov 8 11:18:15 CET 2006
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 09:29 +0100, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> Why? While Latin Modern has many glyphs, there are still large (latin
> based) ranges of Unicode that are not covered. I would simply use a font
> that does include proper glyphs for these Unicode positions. Gentium or
> Charis SIL come to mind, which IMO look nicer than LM anyway.
Well, the choice is not so great as when using TeX-fonts with accents.
> > p.s. Was I supposed to change Subject of the message or this list does
> > not like hijacking?
> IMO it is best to post e new message with a new subject when starting a
> completly unrelated discussion. Replying to an existing message makes it
> harder for the various clients to keep the threads together.
But, this one is (hopefully) related.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20061108/6d437ad0/attachment.bin
More information about the XeTeX