[XeTeX] ifxetex package
wspr81 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 20 02:54:40 CEST 2006
Ross Moore wrote: (regarding engines with eTeX extensions)
> Umm, how about the following engines:
> tex4ht , lacheck , LaTeX2HTML , Omega , Lambda , Aleph
> lamed , hyperlatex , t4ht
> (not sure about the 1st and last.)
> and texi2dvi , texi2html , etc.
You've convinced me that the ifxetex package, however minimal, is a
good idea to act as a flag for programs like the above.
In many cases, the ifxetex package source won't be processed directly
right? Oh, wait, Omega & Lambda don't have eTeX extensions either --
but again, I don't think they're being used.
But I suppose for ultimate compatibility reasons, it would be a good
idea to switch from
In this case I think I've been being overly stubborn :)
P.S. In regard to Bruno's comment on people using pre-0.5 versions of
XeTeX -- as far as I'm concerned, that's simply impossible :)
More information about the XeTeX