[XeTeX] XeTeX: ready for full-time math?
Michael Zedler
michael.zedler at tum.de
Fri Aug 18 01:19:07 CEST 2006
Hello,
>> I recall some time back not too far that there
>> was concern that for heavy math use, XeTeX wasn't yet the best
>> choice.
>
> It's almost ready :)
> I have the intention of readying the support necessary in the not too
> distant future, and this list of course will be the first to know
> when that's done.
>
> The situation is complicated by the fact that there aren't too many
> fonts with tons of maths glyphs...
How about MnSymbol (http://www.hft.ei.tum.de/mz/MnSymbol.pdf), it has
some 1350 glyphs per font in two weights and seven optical sizes?
I've converted the Metafont sources using a combination of
Metapost+FontForge into pfb (so these are not auto-traced fonts), and
generated a test otf using AFDKO 2. Could you please test
http://www.hft.ei.tum.de/mz/MnSymbol10.otf with current XeTeX?
The stylistic alternates are:
SS01: negated version
SS02: use 'big' symbols, e.g. substitute \oplus by \bigoplus
SS03: use symbols suitable for displayed equations
SS05: access alternative symbols that don't have a unicode position
Comments about changing/extending otf features very welcome.
BTW, does XeTeX support already the corrected otf 'size' feature
generated by AFDKO 2 (the above otf has it)?
Michael
More information about the XeTeX
mailing list