[XeTeX] "xeuler" package redundant?

[Jonathan Kew]

On 7 Mar 2005, at 12:43 pm, Will Robertson wrote:

> Alternatively, JK could reply and say "yes, xeuler is no longer 
> required" without having to typeset anything :) :)

I could indeed say that... but as I've forgotten the details of the 
original issue, I don't recommend that you trust my claims! :)

I've a feeling that it was something about the font encoding, which 
means there's a good chance that the 0.9 update will have fixed things.

Anyhow, your test seems to work fine to me, and the output looks 
identical using either the pdftex or xetex engines.

JK