[XeTeX] OS X fonts.
Jonathan Kew
jonathan_kew at sil.org
Sun Jul 25 00:54:16 CEST 2004
On 24 Jul 2004, at 9:12 pm, Alain Schremmer wrote:
> The issue I am now facing is whether TeXshop + XeTeX source can be
> considered "transparent".
....
> I have a feeling that as soon as the source "contains XeTeX-specific
> coding (such as the one [you] suggested for Futura Condensed Medium)",
> the answer will be that the source is NOT transparent.
I'm no expert on interpreting the GNU licences, but it seems to me that
such a LaTeX document would be no less "transparent" than any other
LaTeX document that may contain a few custom \newcommand's, extra font
declarations, etc., in the preamble. It's still simply text with
visible markup that can readily be understood by reading the textual
markup, possibly with reference to publicly-available documentation (in
the case of XeTeX, that's primarily the XeTeX Notes document and the
archives of this list, at present; but I certainly don't think any of
it is on a par with undocumented proprietary formats or markup).
Jonathan
More information about the XeTeX
mailing list