[XeTeX] fontspec 1.5a
herbs at wideopenwest.com
Sat Dec 4 04:47:10 CET 2004
On 12/3/04 9:26 PM, "Will Robertson" <will at guerilla.net.au> wrote:
> As promised, I've made some changes to fontspec that -should- make
> maths work properly again. If those of you who use the various maths
> packages could report any subsequent problems, I'd be much obliged.
> PS Are there only four choices for maths in XeTeX? Computer Modern,
> Euler, Lucida, and MathTime?
Works great with euler but I still have garbage with lucbmath. If I use the
[expert] option with lucbmath I now get the \Gamma but I'm still getting
blanks for most symbols and math italics. I know that Bruno doesn't have the
same problem I'm having on the same file so it must be something in my
configuration. I've checked it against Bruno's and can't find a difference!?
I do want to note that lucidabr works great on the LaTeX version of my test
file as well as all the other stuff I do with that font (my favorite) so it
might have something to do with my old Classic OS 7-9 fonts. Sigh...
(herbs at wideopenwest.com)
More information about the XeTeX