[twg-tds] storing scripts in the texmf tree
Hans Hagen
pragma at wxs.nl
Sun Feb 15 23:54:47 CET 2004
At 17:05 14/02/2004, Olaf Weber wrote:
>It's not _that_ hard, as the infrastructure is mostly in place in my
>new code. However, for individual files (e.g, a .gz'd file or a
>single file in a .zip) it is unlikely to be of much use. In a
>filesystem, the granularity of storage is typically the filesystem
>block size. Filesystem block sizes are typically 1024 bytes (ext2),
>2048 (ISO), 4096 (XFS), and let's not talk about (V)FAT. Most of our
>files are in this range of sizes, with very few larger. This means
>that compressing them singly doesn't gain storage, doesn't gain
>improved I/O access times, and incurs a compression/decompression
>penalty. A net loss, in other words.
i always wonder what block size to take -)
if ISO blocks are that large, then why are the afm files gzipped on tex
live (i always have to recursively gunzip them in order to be useful
>The exception is storing an entire tree into a zip file, where a large
>part of the gains is not the compression but the fact that we do not
>lose half a filesystem block per file.
indeed, much can be gained there, so ... if it's doable ... let's do it -)
Hans
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE/POD/CTS
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf
documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the twg-tds
mailing list