[tldistro] Packaging challenges

[Vladimír Čunát]

On 08/26/2015 07:41 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
>> Originally I thought I would use TL collections as the atomic packages,
>> reading an older paper of yours claiming it was a partition of the TL
>> packages, but then I realized the collections overlap non-trivially
>> nowadays, which would lead to waste of space. Therefore, I'm now using
> 
> No, that is wrong. *collection* do *NOT* overlap. I guarantee you 
> that. Otherwise I couldn't install my packages ;-)
> 
> It is still as I wrote in the paper ...
> 
> You probably talk about *scheme* ... they are overlapping. But not
> the collections.

I knew the distinction between schemes and collections, but I probably
made a mistake somewhere when I thought I found an overlapping pair (I
can't see it anymore). Thanks for correcting me.

Vladimir


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3771 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/tldistro/attachments/20150826/4f2061ff/attachment.bin>