[tlbuild] tl09 build status

[Peter Breitenlohner]

On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Ken Brown wrote:

> On 6/2/2009 7:35 AM, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Ken Brown wrote:
>> 
>>> Second question (probably for Peter): The build produces some warnings.  I 
>>> suspect that most or all of these are harmless, but I don't know for sure. 
>>> I asked about this when I first started trying to build texlive and you 
>>> (Peter) said to wait.  Do you want to look at the warnings now?
>> 
>> Hi Ken,
>> 
>> I assume they are all harmless. To be sure, can you send me all the lines
>> from build log containing 'warning:'?  Should be today because after
>> tomorrow I'll be away for about ten days.

Hi Taco,

I think you should decide about these two cygwin warnings:

../../../texk/web2c/luatexdir/luafilesystem/src/lfs.c:81:1: warning: "_O_TEXT" redefined
/usr/include/sys/_default_fcntl.h:63:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
../../../texk/web2c/luatexdir/luafilesystem/src/lfs.c:82:1: warning: "_O_BINARY" redefined
/usr/include/sys/_default_fcntl.h:64:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition

They are for cygwin-1.7 so I couldn't check all details. On our cygwin-1.5
/usr/include/fcntl.h defines
   _O_BINARY -> O_BINARY -> _FBINARY -> 0x10000
   _O_TEXT   -> O_TEXT   -> _FTEXT   -> 0x20000
this is then replaced in luatexdir/luafilesystem/src/lfs.c by
   _O_BINARY -> 0
   _O_TEXT   -> 0

If this is the right thing to do, you should first undefine them,
otherwise only define them if not already defined.

Regards
Peter