[tlbuild] Testing cxx-runtime-hack -- V 1.1
Thomas A. Schmitz
thomas.schmitz at uni-bonn.de
Mon Jan 26 15:00:43 CET 2009
On Jan 26, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
> Can you remove BLD/am-lt/cxx-test-am-lt, and rerun 'make' in BLD/am-
> lt.
>
> You shold get something like:
> /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link ./CXXLD.sh \
> -o cxx-test-am-lt cxx-test.o
> libtool: link: ./CXXLD.sh -o cxx-test-am-lt cxx-test.o
> ./CXXLD.sh: g++ -O2 -o cxx-test-am-lt cxx-test.o \
> -nodefaultlibs -Wl,-Bstatic -lstdc++ -Wl,-Bdynamic \
> -lm -lgcc_eh -lgcc -lc -lgcc_eh -lgcc
> and the resulting executable should not depend on libstc++.so.
>
> Regards
Here's what I get:
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link ./CXXLD.sh -Wno-deprecated -
g -O2 -o cxx-test-am-lt cxx-test.o
libtool: link: ./CXXLD.sh -Wno-deprecated -g -O2 -o cxx-test-am-lt cxx-
test.o
./CXXLD.sh: g++ -Wno-deprecated -g -O2 -o cxx-test-am-lt cxx-test.o -
nodefaultlibs -Wl,-Bstatic -lstdc++ -Wl,-Bdynamic -lm -lgcc_eh -lgcc -
lc -lgcc_eh -lgcc
ldd cxx-test-am-lt
linux-vdso32.so.1 => (0x00100000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/ppc970/libm.so.6 (0x0ff20000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/ppc970/libc.so.6 (0x0fd70000)
/lib/ld.so.1 (0xf7fb0000)
./cxx-test-am-lt
worksok
Seems to look good, right?
Thomas
More information about the tlbuild
mailing list