<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/11/2024 09:52, David Carlisle
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEW6iOjFoPfDRyRFFVOeMM4D+FTLRwQ1KDrtrYOzgZswX2ZH6g@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>
<p>
<blockquote type="cite">[But] would that have helped Rolf
before he had created (on Thomas Schneider's advice) "<a
href="http://keg.ps" target="_blank">keg.ps</a>" from
"keg.pdf" ?</blockquote>
<br>
</p>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Probably, yes.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>As if you force latex to load foo.pdf it does what you
ask, and hopes it's an EPS file despite the extension</div>
<div>so you get <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Why would LaTeX "hope it's an EPS file" ? Does \includegrapics
not allow the inclusion of other common graphics formats (e.g.,
JPEG) ? If so, is there an <i>a priori</i> reason why LaTeX
would assume encapsulated Postscript rather than any other
supported format ?</p>
<p>-- <br>
<i>** Phil.</i><br>
</p>
<br>
</body>
</html>