<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Bob Tennent wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:20200724141202.-TYOz6CkN%25rdt@cs.queensu.ca">
<pre wrap="">It has recently come to my attention that the Reserved Font
Name provision in the OFL license precludes distributing
different formats under the same user-visible font name.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Where do you see that, Bob. What I see is :<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">3) No Modified Version of the Font Software
may use the Reserved Font<br>
Name(s) unless explicit written permission is granted by the
corresponding<br>
Copyright Holder. This restriction only applies to the primary
font name as<br>
presented to the users.</blockquote>
<br>
Are you saying that, by definition, given a font in (say) TTF and
OTF formats, one is <i>automatically</i> deemed a "Modified Version
of the Font Software" ? What if the font vendor supplies both
formats, is one still automatically a "Modified Version of the Font
Software" ?<br>
<br>
<i>Philip Taylor</i><br>
</body>
</html>