[texhax] Choosing TeX um ... stuff (Eplain)
pfd at pfdstudio.com
Wed Dec 8 13:36:23 CET 2010
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Uwe Lueck <uwe.lueck at web.de> wrote:
> "Peter Davis" , 17.11.2010 22:23:25:
> > I'd appreciate any help with the following questions:
> > * True or False: TeX can be categorized along three orthogonal axes:
> > * by format (plain TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, others?)
> > * by implementation (web2c, pdfTeX/pdfLaTeX, LuaTeX, others?)
> > * by distribution (MikTeX, TeXLive, MacTeX, others?)
> It seems to me that FAQ "Things with “TeX” in the name":
> nicely covers the questions and adds a few things.
Thanks for that pointer! That is indeed an excellent summary of what I was
considering, with useful links for more info.
For the moment, I've decided to go with LaTeX on XeTeX ... xelatex. The
ability to use system fonts and the fontspec package is of paramount
importance for this project. The textpos package is also essential, and
seems to do what I need.
Thanks for the information!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the texhax