[texhax] TeX -> PostScript, but in a resolution-independent manner
zsdc at wp.pl
Wed Jun 11 04:55:50 CEST 2003
Karl Berry wrote:
> But if DVI files don't include the glyph shapes, how can they be
> really device-independent?
>They are device independent in the sense that the output from TeX does
>not depend on the eventual output device.
Thanks. Now I understand what the DVI files really are.
> What if I send my DVI file to someone, who has slightly different
> fonts installed? Wouldn't I get different results then?
>Certainly. In fact, this happens all the time -- consider a write/white
>printer vs. write/black. Not to mention a printer vs. a monochrome
>display vs. a color display. All will show different pixels. So DVI
>files cannot be device independent in the sense that every device will
>show exactly the same pixels, that doesn't make sense.
Yes, of course, now I understand that. The devices themselves are
different so nothing can be perfectly device-independent...
>Obviously it would be possible to configure a DVI driver such that a `B'
>got output for character 65 instead of an `A' (in cmr10, let's say).
>DVI format cannot prevent stupidity, it can only make excellent results
And they really are excellent. When I found TeX I had no typesetting
background at all, the whole experience with printing text I got was
using Microsoft Word and similar products. The results I get now are
truely amazing. I can make my own documents looking just like Donald
Knuth's The Art of Computer Programming, which is something still hard
>You might consider joining GUST (http://www.gust.org.pl/) or TUG
>(tug.org) or some other user group. One of the benefits is software
>cd's, namely "TeX Live". The next version should be getting produced in
>early August, and it will include the latest teTeX. (All the software
>is also freely available over the Internet, but since you said you
>couldn't download it ...)
Tomas Rokicki was kind enough to aks me for my test files and he has
already told me what I was doing wrong. I was using a non-standard font
size, which caused dvips to use bitmap fonts instead of Type 1 even with
-Pcmz switch. So the problem is already solved. But I think it could be
a good idea to join GUST anyway. Thanks.
More information about the texhax