[tex4ht] [bug #343] Package pdfpages
Michal Hoftich
michal.h21 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 9 10:24:30 CET 2016
Hi Reinhard,
yes, they seem to be the same:
rungs.png PNG 595x842 595x842+0+0 8-bit sRGB 35.7KB 0.000u 0:00.009
convert.png PNG 595x842 595x842+0+0 8-bit sRGB 17.7KB 0.000u 0:00.000
It isn't so bad in this case, the rungs produced file that is just
twice as big :)
Used options:
rungs -sDEVICE=pngalpha -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -dFirstPage=1
-dLastPage=1 -sOutputFile=rungs.png sample.pdf
Michal
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Reinhard Kotucha
<reinhard.kotucha at web.de> wrote:
> On 2016-12-07 at 12:11:04 +0100, Michal Hoftich wrote:
>
> > thanks, rungs seems to work. Images produced by Imagemagick are
> > much smaller, but I guess this is not so big issue nowadays.
>
> Hi Michal,
> are the parameters (color depth an resolution) the same? You can
> retrieve some meta data with ImageMagick's identify(1).
>
> Regards,
> Reinhard
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Reinhard Kotucha Phone: +49-511-3373112
> Marschnerstr. 25
> D-30167 Hannover mailto:reinhard.kotucha at web.de
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the tex4ht
mailing list