[tex4ht] Fwd: biblatex/tex4ht error

Johannes Wilm mail at johanneswilm.org
Thu Aug 25 19:23:30 CEST 2011

I played around with that over the last few days. Just defining it as empty
doesn't work. Defining it as 0pt creates problems when using more than about
20 citations. Defining it as

\def\blx at unitmark{1pt}

seems to work. This value I arrived at simply by trying around (not
scientific!) I received another email today by some tex4ht people who claim
that the way to go is to define it as

\def\blx at unitmark{23sp}

I assume they will fix the problem.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Philipp Lehman <lehman at gmx.net>
Date: Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: biblatex/tex4ht error
To: Johannes Wilm <mail at johanneswilm.org>

Am Montag, 22. August 2011 schrieben Sie:
> after talking to some text4ht people, I was advised to ask you  if
> \blx at unitmark was in biblatex at a time and what its function was.
> After updating my texLive 2011 installation, biblatex and tex4ht
> suddenly stopped working.

Hi Johannes,

\blx at unitmark has been removed in Biblatex 1.6. I have no idea why and
how text4ht expects it, but you can probably work around the error by
putting something like

\def\blx at unitmark{}

in biblatex.cfg.

Philipp Lehman <lehman at gmx.net>

Johannes Wilm
tel: +1 (520) 399 8880
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/tex4ht/attachments/20110825/20d9c3d6/attachment.html>

More information about the tex4ht mailing list