<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Naveen M K wrote:</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:100941599800051@mail.yandex.com">
<pre wrap="">It would be good to have a Chocolatey Package(<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://chocolatey.org/docs/getting-started#what-are-chocolatey-packages">https://chocolatey.org/docs/getting-started#what-are-chocolatey-packages</a>) as discussed in previous emails. </pre>
</blockquote>
<p>May I play Devil's Advocate and ask <i>why </i>you claim "it
would be good to have a Chocolatey Package [for TeX Live]" ? What
problems do you find with the present installer, and would you not
agree that if the current installer is sub-optimal then the
obvious alternative (as far as TeX Live for Microsoft Windows is
concerned) would be to re-write the installer as an MSI
("Microsoft Installer") file, with all the benefits that that
would bring, including, of course, full support for uninstalling
(Start / Control Panel / Programs and Features / Uninstall or
change a program) ?</p>
<p>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I personally being a Windows user like to install using Chocolatey also I would be happy if texlive is installed through that.</pre>
</blockquote>
</p>
<p>I too am a Windows user (Windows 7 Enterprise, 64-bit, multiple
instantiations) and can see no benefits to choosing Chocolatey at
all, when compared to MSI.<br>
</p>
<p><i>Philip Taylor</i><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>