Aleph

[Taylor, P]

Norbert Preining wrote:

On Tue, 15 Oct 2019, Taylor, P wrote:


https://www.dropbox.com/s/t40sik54ugshhni/involute-gold-gamma.pdf?dl=0
No other changes, but seriously worse rendering of the Tibetan IMHO.


That looks indeed much worse, but are you sure it is the same input? It
shows *two* "u" subscripts, which is surprising.


Absolutely the same input, Norbert :  I made only a three/four/three character change in the file ("ans" -> "erif" -> "ans") and observed the output change.  The relevant lines of code are :

\newfontface \tibetan [Color=text-colour, Language=Tibetan, Script=Tibetan] {Noto Serif Tibetan Bold}

\def \Tibetan #1{{\tibetan #1}}


Üdvözlet ~ % Hungarian

ཕེབས་པར་དགའ་བསུ་ཞུ། ~ % Tibetan

Fàilte ~ % Scottish Gaelic

style characters={ཕེབས་པར་དགའ་བསུ་ཞུ།} with {character command=\Tibetan},


The first two are lines 24 \& 36, the latter lines 68–70 and 241, so there is a very small probability that I might have inadvertently amended the latter while intending to amend the former.

** Phil.




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/attachments/20191015/20b2e1d1/attachment.html>