Dependencies

[Zdenek Wagner]

No, it's line 121 in rerunfilecheck.sty. You have to count properly
the right parentheses.

Zdeněk Wagner
http://ttsm.icpf.cas.cz/team/wagner.shtml
http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz

po 25. 11. 2019 v 15:16 odesílatel Maximilian Nöthe
<maximilian.noethe at tu-dortmund.de> napsal:
>
> Strange, what happened here then:
>
> If I read the log correctly, there is a RequirePackage{pdftexcmds} in
> iftex.sty
> https://travis-ci.org/MaxNoe/tudothesis/builds/616656178
>
>
>
> On 25.11.19 15:13, David Carlisle wrote:
> > The current version of iftex has no dependencies on any other packages.
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 at 14:09, Maximilian Nöthe
> > <maximilian.noethe at tu-dortmund.de> wrote:
> >> iftex needs pdftexcmds but seems not to be included in its dependencies
> >>
> >> On 08.11.19 00:38, Karl Berry wrote:
> >>
> >>      > It's needed to build xelatex-dev, which is part of xetex.tlpsrc.
> >>
> >>      Er, I'm still confused :) I thought latex-base-dev would be strictly
> >>      opt-in.
> >>
> >> Ok, I split xelatex-dev into its own package. Still part of
> >> collection-xetex, so the change should be mostly invisible except in
> >> cases like yours where you're working with individual packages.
> >>
> >> The underlying idea is that, long ago, xetex itself was "opt-in", in the
> >> sense that one could install the whole (La)TeX system without any XeTeX.
> >> It was all segregated into c-xetex. Conversely, if someone asks for
> >> xetex, they get everything; it's never been big enough to have
> >> c-xetexextra. Therefore, when I added xelatex-dev, I just added it to the
> >> xetex package, since it was the easiest thing to do.
> >>
> >> That scenario should still basically be possible with core latex,
> >> although there are surely plenty of xetex-dependent packages in other
> >> collections at this point. -k