regression/bug in graphics inclusion with double extension
Norbert Preining
preining at logic.at
Fri Nov 8 08:31:31 CET 2019
Hi David,
I finally found the time looking into the regression, and it turned out
that a *simple* document (without grffile or grfext) worked till
2019-09-30 and broke afterwards:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
Hello
\includegraphics{{oma.foo}.png}
\end{document}
Mind the addition braces.
This worked up to know, and Sphinx uses that for documentation building
of python modules (sphinxdoc).
I just tested with LaTeX 2e <2019-10-01> patch level 2 (TL updated)
and there it works again, while with pl1 and no pl, it doesn't.
Is this correct?
Thanks
Norbert
--
PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info
Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev
GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
More information about the tex-live
mailing list