regression/bug in graphics inclusion with double extension

Norbert Preining preining at logic.at
Fri Nov 8 08:31:31 CET 2019


Hi David,

I finally found the time looking into the regression, and it turned out
that a *simple* document (without grffile or grfext) worked till
2019-09-30 and broke afterwards:
	\documentclass{article}
	\usepackage{graphicx}
	\begin{document}
	Hello
	\includegraphics{{oma.foo}.png}
	\end{document}
Mind the addition braces.

This worked up to know, and Sphinx uses that for documentation building
of python modules (sphinxdoc).

I just tested with LaTeX 2e <2019-10-01> patch level 2 (TL updated)
and there it works again, while with pl1 and no pl, it doesn't.

Is this correct?

Thanks

Norbert

--
PREINING Norbert                               http://www.preining.info
Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev
GPG: 0x860CDC13   fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13


More information about the tex-live mailing list