patgen SIGSEGV on aarch64-linux

[Karl Berry]

Hi Johannes,

    I suspect that the changes of trie{,c}_size with -r51154 and/or -r51201

Presumably so. ENOMEM is a plausible error for that to be the culprit,
and nothing else meaningful has changed.

    Any ideas?

Decrease the numbers until they work (and then you or I can commit the
new numbers). If it ends up being too small and we want to address the
original request, we'll have to make the numbers either configurable or
dynamically reallocate the arrays. --thanks, karl.