[tex-live] repeated xelatex call destroys pdf output
Shunsaku Hirata
shunsaku.hirata74 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 4 22:58:20 CEST 2018
Hi,
There is some important changes to xdvipdfmx made on 20180821 and
20180904 related to PDF inclusion. I could not reporoduce the problem
on Windows 10 but it might be related. Xdvipdfmx version 20180821 had
some problems in including PDF file which was fixed on 20180904.
Shunsaku Hirata
2018年9月5日(水) 5:32 Johannes Hielscher <jhielscher at posteo.de>:
>
> The bug was reported for the TL2018 .deb packages for Buster (testing).
>
> Here on Debian Stretch (stable), repeated builds run as intended with
> both TL2016 via package manager, and a current TL2018 from tlmgr.
> Maybe, the problem is not within XeTeX itself, but somewhere else
> in the Buster userland (freetype?).
>
> Norbert, on which Debian branch were you able to reproduce the bug?
>
> Johannes
>
> Am Tue, 4 Sep 2018 20:35:01 +0200
> schrieb Zdenek Wagner <zdenek.wagner at gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried again and it really works even with the fontenc package so it
> > might be something Debian specific. I use Fedora with TL from TUG,
> > not the rpm's.
> >
> > Zdeněk Wagner
> > http://ttsm.icpf.cas.cz/team/wagner.shtml
> > http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz
> >
> >
> > út 4. 9. 2018 v 17:27 odesílatel David Carlisle
> > <d.p.carlisle at gmail.com> napsal:
> >
> > > the \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} line is certainly wrong for xetex but
> > > on my updated (cygwin) texlive 2018 pdfinfo doesn't give any errors
> > > on the generated file with or without this line.
> > >
> > > what happens if you use --no-pdf to xelatex and then run xdvipdfmx
> > > by hand on the resulting xdv, that usually gives better diagnostics
> > > for pdf generation stage.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > David
> > >
>
>
More information about the tex-live
mailing list