[tex-live] Permission bits of installed packages
akhlaghi at gnu.org
Thu Mar 12 05:39:50 CET 2015
On 03/11/2015 11:14 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> Recently I set my umask to 077 (in /etc/profile.d). The next time I
>> So I wanted to ask if it is possible to correct the permission bits
>> (maybe to 755) during installation so the result doesn't depend on
>> the user's umask?
> It is not only the user's umask, but also the one of root. If you don't
> want this, then you have to make sure that what you put in profile.d/*
> is proper.
> Sorry, we will not override permissions that root has set via umask.
> A simple solution for this is
> * either install TeX Live as user and not as root (-> no need for sudo)
> * or give root proper umask, an umask of 077 for root is *very* bad idea
I understand, I just wanted to say that most other build systems ignore
the umask, for example here is a build script (after running "make
install") of a program named astmkprof (which uses GNU Autoconf and GNU
libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c astmkprof
/usr/bin/mkdir -p '/usr/local/etc'
/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 astmkprof.conf '/usr/local/etc'
/usr/bin/mkdir -p '/usr/local/share/man/man1'
/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 astmkprof.1 '/usr/local/share/man/man1'
Before install this was the long listing for astmkprof:
$ ls -l astmkprof
-rwx------ 1 myuserid myuserid 3743200 Mar 12 13:26 astmkprof
After install it is:
$ ls -l /usr/local/bin/astmkprof
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3743200 Mar 12 13:27 astmkprof
You can see that the GNU Build system (which is widely used by nearly
all users of GNU/Linux distributions and other OSs) explicitly sets the
permission bits on install and does not rely on the value of umask (you
can see that its default is "rwxr-xr-x"). As you can see, it also does
this for the man page. Infact from the manual of GNU Coreutils, this is
the whole purpose of the "install" program, otherwise the build script
would simply have used "cp".
So my question is that while most other components of the operating
system (which use Autoconf and Automake) don't rely on or ignore the
"permissions that root has set via umask", why does Tex live rely on it?
I understand that it might be an internal convention for Texinfo, I just
don't understand its relevance given that other major programs ignore umask.
Thank you very much,
More information about the tex-live