[tex-live] TeX Live and GNU FreeFont

Zdenek Wagner zdenek.wagner at gmail.com
Wed Apr 15 16:41:53 CEST 2015

Hi Norbert,

thank you for clarification. When the information appeared on Kevin's blog
and in the XeTeX list, it was not clear that the svn head is distributed in
the "opt-in" TL repository. I hpe this solution is OK.

Do you just package automatically the head or do you run some tests before
doing it? I have a lot of test files for Devanagari. The tests are not
machine radable, it is necessary to look at the PDF files. I can do it
before you package a new svn release.

Zdeněk Wagner

2015-04-15 15:43 GMT+02:00 Norbert Preining <preining at logic.at>:

> Hi Zdenek,
> what you describe is already happening!
> * TeX Live contains the latest released version
> * my tlptexlive contains the svn head
> The svn head was *never* part of TeX Live
> So I don't see any problem here.
> Unfortunately Steve was not very happy about this development, but maybe
> this has changed?
> All the best
> Norbert
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> PREINING, Norbert                              http://www.preining.info
> JAIST, Japan                                 TeX Live & Debian Developer
> GPG: 0x860CDC13   fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0  ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Apr 15, 2015, at 9:39 PM, Zdenek Wagner <zdenek.wagner at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I want to open a question of GNU FreeFont that should be clarified before
> TL 2015 gets frozen for DVD. As we know, the latest official release is
> quite old and its Devanagari block does not work with HarfBuzz. On the
> other hand, the Devanagari block in the subversion repository is OK (I will
> test it soon with TL 2015 pretest in order to be sure). This means that one
> of the most beautiful Devanagari fonts is not officially available to
> normal users. Some time ago TL 2014 started to distribute GNU FreeFont from
> the head of the svn repository. This seems to be good news for users but
> bad news for font developers. I see two possibilities:
> 1. If the font is ready for an official release, it would be good to
> release it before TL is frozen for DVD production
> 2. If there are still too things to be resolved before release, we should
> take advantage of the possibility of several TL repositories. The standard
> repository should contain the officially released FreeFont while an
> additional repository will contain FreeFont from the head of the svn repo.
> The advantage is that those who prefer a stable font and do not need
> Devanagari will not configure this additional TL repo. Those who need
> Devanagari and are prepared to take the risk that the font does not work
> will configure this additional repository.
> Is this reasonable?
> Zdeněk Wagner
> http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/wagner/
> http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/attachments/20150415/7804d446/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the tex-live mailing list