[tex-live] Bug#764122: MnSymbol and new[tp]x shouldn't be in the texlive-fonts-extra ghetto
Reinhard Kotucha
reinhard.kotucha at web.de
Sat Oct 11 02:31:30 CEST 2014
On 2014-10-10 at 22:00:55 +0000, Karl Berry wrote:
> Hi Juliusz,
>
> What about mnsymbol? It's a fairly small package, and is a
> simple, hassle-free way to get a bunch of mathematical symbols
> that blend relatively well with many common fonts
>
> I guess I don't have any overwhelming argument against it, but it
> would be nice if I had a note from at least one other user that
> moving it from one collection to the other would be a practical
> benefit.
>
> My general feeling is that for pretty much any package X in a
> collection C, there is an argument that it should be in collection
> C2 instead. So in self-defense, I try to be conservative in such
> moves.
IMO mnsymbol should be part of the collection containing all the other
math symbol fonts. Whether it should be in texlive-fonts-extra or
in texlive-fonts-recommended is another thing. But all math symbol
fonts should be in one and the same collection. Otherwise the concept
of collections doesn't make sense anymore.
Regards,
Reinhard
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhard Kotucha Phone: +49-511-3373112
Marschnerstr. 25
D-30167 Hannover mailto:reinhard.kotucha at web.de
------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the tex-live
mailing list