joseph.wright at morningstar2.co.uk
Thu Nov 27 12:30:07 CET 2014
On 27/11/2014 11:18, Victor Ivrii wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Norbert Preining <preining at logic.at> wrote:
>> it has been since long our policy to *not* include software
>> and packacges that only provide support for commercial software.
> Is Adobe Reader considered as a commercial s/w? Or the problem is with the
> required version?
It's not the financial cost here that's important: it's the license.
Adobe Reader is closed-source and not FSF 'free':the fact it's available
without financial cost is not the point. That applies to all versions of
More information about the tex-live