# [tex-live] Regressions triggered by 'latex' package updates on pretest

Joseph Wright joseph.wright at morningstar2.co.uk
Mon May 19 12:33:51 CEST 2014

On 19/05/2014 11:09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:56 AM, David Carlisle <d.p.carlisle at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We (latex project) try to discourage people sending bugs in packages we have
>> never seen to latex bugs address  for reasons you might guess:-)
>
> Makes sense.
>
>> But we do
>> like to be told if an update breaks contributed packages (something we try
>> to avoid, but hard to test in advance) Probably latex-l
>> (LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE) is a better list.
>
> This is good to know.
>
>> There isn't much the texlive team can do as they are more or less
>> constrained to distributing what's on ctan (I think:-)
>
> I imagined so, but I figured there were some knowledgeable people
> around here who could direct me to the correct place to go. Thank you
> for the quick reply, advice, and for looking at the logs, David.
>
> Best,
>
> Scott

By the way, I can only get the CV demo to run: the other two require
non-standard classes. I can cut down to:

\documentclass[nologo]{europecv}
\usepackage[utf8]{luainputenc}

\begin{document}

\begin{europecv}{}

\end{europecv}{}

\end{document}

and I know broadly where the issue comes from: changes to inputenc. You
can test that by compiling with last year's inputenc.sty in the
directory with the above: it should work.
--
Joseph Wright