[tex-live] Fontconfig for XeTeX versus regular fontconfig
George N. White III
gnwiii at gmail.com
Thu Oct 27 12:33:53 CEST 2011
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Karl Berry <karl at freefriends.org> wrote:
> I have to fork my self
> I know the feeling. It's a heavyweight fork, always running out of vm
> when I try it ...
Homeland Security would probable snatch both of you and spirit you off to
Roswell or Nevada and we TL users would be worse off.
> No one is forced to use that procedure. It's there if it helps people.
> If it doesn't help people, don't do it. If that means they can't use
> the system fonts, well, that's what it means.
> The problem occurs due XeTeX which seems to depend on
> an on fontconfig to be able to handle its fonts below
> the TL path, compare with
> XeTeX can look up via fontconfig or by filename. This is ultimately
> chosen by the user's document. Admittedly system lookups are
> "encouraged" in a number of ways, which I think is highly unfortunate
> and poor practice, but it's not under my control. I've already made my
> views known to the various maintainer(s).
> Anyway, problems with/enhancements for XeTeX should be reported to the
> XeTeX maintainer(s), xetex.sf.net. It is still Jonathan Kew (hi
> Jonathan), unless and until another capable volunteer comes forward whom
> Jonathan accepts. I don't see a TL issue here. Sorry.
In the near term, this is a documentation problem. I think it is a mistake for
TL to ignore fontconfig as there are times you want to embed TL output in
other documents and then it is important that fonts work the same. A big part
of TL is font support because OS support has not kept up with the needs, but
that has been improving. I hope for a day when TL can rely entirely on OS font
support, but that will require things like a way for users who don't
use math fonts to
prune the list of fonts shown in application menus.
George N. White III <aa056 at chebucto.ns.ca>
Head of St. Margarets Bay, Nova Scotia
More information about the tex-live