[tex-live] texmf tree
Robin.Fairbairns at cl.cam.ac.uk
Tue Nov 16 18:45:50 CET 2010
Dr. Clea F. Rees <cfrees at imapmail.org> wrote:
> I noticed that the documentation for tapir is under latex. Should it
> not be under fonts?
> Also memdesign is under fonts which does not seem especially
> The licence for nkarta seems questionable. It is public domain only
> barring objection from the original author of karta who has evidently
> proven uncontactable.
exactly so. nkarta itself is pretty old, though, and no comment from
the author of karta has arisen. so who knows?
there are a painfully large number of packages on ctan, whose author is
uncontactable for a proper statement of licence.
> CTAN says that the licence of termcal is unknown. The comments in the
> sty file refer the reader to copyright information in the dtx file but
> I cannot find any such information in that file. However, the comments
> do strongly suggest that the author intended the package to be released
> under some sort of free licence. But it does not seem entirely clear.
but i don't (and afaik karl doesn't either) think one should assume
anything based on "hints". it's sad -- but the possible consequences,
of making an incorrect assumption about something whose author turns out
to be litigious, are too ghastly for us to take chances.
More information about the tex-live