Robin.Fairbairns at cl.cam.ac.uk
Tue Mar 17 17:52:05 CET 2009
Daniel Becker <daniel.becker at uni-rostock.de> wrote:
> just for your information: The license information at
> is inaccurate. Markus Kohm, the author, states in his blog that all of
> splitindex is under the LPLL license and this is also stated in the
> various files.
> http://www.komascript.de/node/1057 (second paragraph)
there are other restrictions on distribution. lppl+other restrictions
.ne. lppl (in this case, imo).
> Can splitindex be included in TeXLive, then?
i don't believe so, but for other reasons.
More information about the tex-live