[tex-live] Bug#488707: ps4pdf.sty missing
Robin.Fairbairns at cl.cam.ac.uk
Tue Mar 10 13:08:19 CET 2009
Norbert Preining <preining at logic.at> wrote:
> we got a bug report that ps4pdf.sty is missing. It is true that it is
> listed on CTAN in obsolete, and I am not sure if we every included it in
> TeX Live, and I have no idea whether it should be used or should not be
> used, so please advise.
> I am indifferent on that stuff.
istr we had a request that ps4pdf be moved to obsolete -- i think we
were told that pst-pdf supersedes it.
the whole area is a mess, of course: there are at least 4 packages
aiming to do the same thing. the suggestion that ps4pdf is the only
documented option is i think less than reasonable: pst-pdf seems well
documented (to my eye -- i've never used it); and epstopdf is so trivial
that i've never felt the need to look for docs...
whatever, i don't see why tl shouldn't hold a copy; there's precedent
both for removing obsolete packages and for for keeping them for
backwards compatibility reasons, surely?
i note, for example, that tl holds fnpara.sty, which is inferior to the
implementation in footmisc, which in turn is inferior to the stuff in
bigfoot and friends.
More information about the tex-live