[tex-live] Improved Garamond available - please include in CTAN
Reinhard Kotucha
reinhard.kotucha at web.de
Tue Jul 21 02:00:46 CEST 2009
On 20 July 2009 Robin Fairbairns wrote:
> i agree with almost all that reinhard says, but
>
> > In particular, the Adobe Type1 spec
> > requires that there should never exist two different fonts with the
> > same /FontName.
>
> sure. pity some people aren't observing this rule.
It's a pity indeed. As far as getnonfreefonts is concerned, I support
the original fonts in the first place. I have no other choice.
> but...
>
> > And, of course, the /UniqueID has to be unique.
>
> is it not the case that adobe's given up on unique ids?
Yes, they don't assign new ones any more. It's wrong if two different
fonts share the same /UniqueID, but it's fine if a font doesn't have a
/UniqueID at all.
Regards,
Reinhard
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhard Kotucha Phone: +49-511-3373112
Marschnerstr. 25
D-30167 Hannover mailto:reinhard.kotucha at web.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is NO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the tex-live
mailing list