[tex-live] gellmu executable name conflicts?
frank at kuesterei.ch
Sun Feb 10 18:00:33 CET 2008
Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> wrote:
>> Can you distro guys check, please, and let me know?
>> (Or if any other problems with the above.)
> Indeed these names are much too generic and too short.
I agree with Patrice. I couldn't find any conflicts in Debian ATM, but
still those names shouldn't be used.
I also think that it serves the users better if the programs have
self-explaining names. Like fontconvert-xg2pl (just guessing).
Are all those executables actually meant to be used directly by the
document author? If there's actually a script which calls them, one
could also consider installing them in /usr/lib/gellmu.
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
More information about the tex-live