gerhardt at math.uni-heidelberg.de
Tue Jan 9 20:38:13 CET 2007
On Jan 8, 2007, at 15:03, Staszek Wawrykiewicz wrote:
> Hmmm, we have in mind the whole distribution on cd/dvd for simple
> As they see "2006", they can think: "ahh, somehow not a fresh
> Do you remember Boulhakow's "sturgeon that's second-grade fresh"?
I like to think of the average tex user as being a bit more
sophisticated than the average consumer, maybe he enjoys to relish
occasionally a bottle of good wine, a Barbaresco di Gaja or a Chateau
Pétrus, and thus knows that the year of the harvest is more important
than the year when it has been bottled.
The coming TL is certainly vintage 2006 and should be named as such.
The proposed label 2006-07 or 2006-2007 looks ridiculous and will
stick out like a sore thumb in the hopefully long list of TL vintages.
More information about the tex-live