[tex-live] "other-free" licence definition in the catalogue [addendum]
rainer.schoepf at proteosys.com
Sat Nov 4 11:05:37 CET 2006
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Robin Fairbairns wrote:
> the intention is not to subvert anyone's efforts towards licensing of
> "correctly" specified packages -- the idea is to have a less draconian
> category than "other" has been up to now.
For example, I've been at a loss how to classify a package whose source
code has a different license than its documentation (GPL vs. FDL).
More information about the tex-live