[tex-live] Proposal for collection reorganization

[Frank Küster]

Norbert Preining <preining at logic.at> wrote:

> ad 2) collection-chemistry/-science
>
> Reading through the list of packages in collection-latexextra I have a
> hard time to make a selection what to move to -science and what not.
> Where do we draw (IF WE DO!) the line? Computer science move yes or no,
> some special packages yes or no, radical approach?
>
> I would opt for a radical approach to move *everything* which is somehow
> related to natural sciences, linguistic, philosophy etc into this
> package. This way we would get two decent sized collections where
> latexextra contains stuff which is generally usefull, while science
> cotains specific stuff.

Same problem, now the other way round:  English speaking people will not
expect linguistic stuff in "science".  Is there a word for
"Wissenschaft" or french "science" in english?  

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)