[tex-live] Proposal for collection reorganization

[Norbert Preining]

On Son, 04 Jun 2006, Karl Berry wrote:
> However, "required" is clearly up for interpretation, since TL does not
> include Utopia and that's "required" too.

No it is not. The psnfss 00readme.txt states this clearly:
| The Utopia fonts are no longer a "required" component of
| the LaTeX system, because of their license conditions.
| Yet YOU MUST NOT OMIT the related font metrics and map
| file records, regardless of whether or not the Type1 font
| files are actually installed.  Thus, the user will be
| able to add the fonts without any further changes;
| besides, other packages or virtual fonts may rely on
| these TFMs.


Best wishes

Norbert

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at>             Università di Siena
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094      fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BABWORTH
Something which justifies having a really good cry.
			--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-tetex-maint-REQUEST at lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster at lists.debian.org