[tex-live] teTeX: no next release

[Robin Fairbairns]

martin schröder wrote:

> 2006/6/3, Robin Fairbairns <Robin.Fairbairns at cl.cam.ac.uk>:
> > ah.  the .drv style is in *so* much of a minority in latex2e packages,
> > it never occurred to me to suggest it.  it's presumable a pre-2e
> > notation?  (i never used the pre-2e doc stuff.)
> 
> No. One advantage of drv is that you are allowed to change the drv,
> but not the dtx or ins.

what does that give you, that you don't get from ltxdoc.cfg?

not that i care much, you understand: as i said earlier, .drv-based
documentation is readily recognised in a script, so it's not a
problem.