[tex-live] Updating some files in texmf-dist

[Gerben Wierda]

On Jan 4, 2005, at 19:32, Karl Berry wrote:

>     Does this mean that the next stuff will all go via cvs/sarovar?
>
> sarovar, yes, I hope so.
>
> cvs vs. svn (vs. p4), yet to be seen.

I think a freeze during the transition is of course necessary. But when 
the decision about what and where has not even been taken, does a 
freeze now make any sense? Why  not make sure we know what is going to 
happen first, then make a plan and include the freeze period in that 
migration plan. The way it goes now, we go into an indefinite freeze.

What holds for source.development also holds a bit for texmf-dist. 
After all, texmf-dist is in part also development. I have not seen a 
compelling argument why texmf-dist shoul dbe frozen while 
source.development should not.

G