[tex-live] Re: Re: Re: Re: Aleph versioning
Giuseppe Bilotta
bilotta78 at hotpop.com
Sat Sep 4 05:14:04 CEST 2004
Olaf Weber wrote:
> Karl Berry writes:
>
> >> You do NOT want "release candidate" numbers like 'rc3' in
> >> \Alephrevision. A release candidate had better pretend in all but its
> >> banner to the release.
>
> > Why do you say this? It seems to me that the whole point of a version
> > number is to uniquely identify the release.
>
> IMHO a "release candidate" specifically should have the behaviour of
> the final product, with the exception of some printed banners.
>
> > If you fake the version number to say it's version 2 when it's really
> > 1.9rc2 (or whatever), then anyone who wants to distinguish has to
> > find some method other than the version number to do so, obviating the
> > whole point of having version numbers in the first place.
>
> But a release candidate for version two of an interpreter should, for
> the purpose of (say) scripts that run on this interpreter, claim to
> _be_ version two. Otherwise the scripts are misled, or worse, the
> scripts have to be made aware of the (typically non-standard and
> non-numerical) version identification scheme used for "release
> candidates".
This makes sense. I'll make it return .0
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
Can't you see
It all makes perfect sense
Expressed in dollar and cents
Pounds shillings and pence
(Roger Waters)
More information about the tex-live
mailing list