[tex-live] Build fails for FreeBSD 4.10

[Eddie Kohler]

Fabrice wrote me and said he had changes, but never actually forwarded 
them, I think.

I don't terribly mind these changes although I'd feel better if they 
were like real changes, with justification, rather than just random 
bolts from the blue.  Why is CDECL only needed on _those_ functions?!?! 
  Weird.

Karl: current t1utils ./configure *does* search for uint32_t, and 
provides fake definitions if one is not found.  See configure.in.  I'd 
thought that uint32_t existed iff uint16_t existed; that seems 
reasonable but perhaps is not.  Another reason to be skeptical of this 
change.

Eddie


On Sep 30, 2004, at 1:59 PM, Karl Berry wrote:

>     but the files t1asm.c and others differ from the official
>     distribution's version by hacks added by Fabrice.
>
> Thank you for checking into this, Vladimir.
> Based on that, I changed those typedef's to be #ifdef WIN32, so we can
> get on with life.
> (Although a cleaner solution would be to configure for uint16_t, I
> guess; it wouldn't surprise me if some Unix systems lacked it as well.)
>
> Manfred, can you try compiling again now, please?
>
> Eddie, will you accept the changes?  The CDECL stuff is ugly but
> harmless, just is an empty #define on non-Windows.  If so, Vladimir,
> could you send a diff please?  Since you already have the trees set up.
>
> Thanks,
> karl