[tex-live] omega and antomega

Staszek Wawrykiewicz staw at gust.org.pl
Tue Nov 9 06:40:16 CET 2004

On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, David Kastrup wrote:

> > Sounds good, but unless/until someone is clear on exactly what changes
> > are needed and exactly what the consequences are, I suggest we do
> > nothing.  Now is not the time to experiment.  I wish it had come up
> > earlier.
> I don't understand.  antomega is a bunch of style files (at well as
> some otps), like Babel is a bunch of style files.  There is nothing
> needed in the way of "experimenting" except placing the files
> somewhere in Omega's input tree.
> What exactly is the problem right now?

Ehh... have you read my message from 6 Nov? The problem was how to clearly
separate/distinguish antomega as *package* from "omega" and "lambda",
then update "antomega" from CTAN. The first turn was made by Sebastian
(thanks, btw). I've spent some time to finish that, mostly cleaning
omega and lambda from old antomega stuff.
As antomega is some addition to lambda, all input files goes to
tex/lambda/antomega/ following TDS (exactly like packages in tex/latex/).
Foolowing that I've moved doc/omega/antomega to doc/lambda/antomega
(the same for source/omega/antomega -> source/lambda/antomega ).
Change #6441 (and really headache).

Staszek Wawrykiewicz
StaW at gust.org.pl

More information about the tex-live mailing list